Mediawiki

m
m
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
We have also run into the difficulty of choosing a tool that would be easy in use and wouldn't require any complicated actions to create a nice-looking and proper functional site. After making a list of possible site building tools and considering a great number of pros and cons we have chosen wiki (also known as MediaWiki). The reason for our choice were as follows:
 
We have also run into the difficulty of choosing a tool that would be easy in use and wouldn't require any complicated actions to create a nice-looking and proper functional site. After making a list of possible site building tools and considering a great number of pros and cons we have chosen wiki (also known as MediaWiki). The reason for our choice were as follows:
 +
 
- it allows to create a database-driven site, which is useful to keep the data properly organized;
 
- it allows to create a database-driven site, which is useful to keep the data properly organized;
 +
 
- it is easy to install and manage;
 
- it is easy to install and manage;
 +
 
- you can choose the desired skin and easily change it to another one when needed;
 
- you can choose the desired skin and easily change it to another one when needed;
 +
 
- it has a great number of addons available on the net, which help to improve your site performance and customize it the way you want.
 
- it has a great number of addons available on the net, which help to improve your site performance and customize it the way you want.
  

Revision as of 13:11, 23 November 2011

rss feed for my website